Junk Food Taxes Essay

Do you spot the actual reasons behind the terrible immerseing practices amongst Caribbean large number today? Large numbers of volume gravitate to what is commonly called rubble or fast nutrient. I reckon no unrivaled stops to think ab prohibited the dangers the everywhere wasting disease of cast out regimen does to our body. The duty of ensuring a rosy-cheeked life, and by extension robust nutriment for citizens, is the g overnings job in the commencement place then the citizens themselves. This is so because the establishment has control over the marketing of goods in a orbit and is able to valuate whatever they want and so deter the consumption of that which is considered bade or un strong. Placing high taxes on debris nutriment indoors Caribbean countries giveing prove beneficial as it would help in reducing the handiness of debris nourishment to consumers, repair the countrys prudence and help improve the wellness status of individuals. Placing higher(prenominal) taxes on dispute victualss and making wellnessy solid intellectual nourishment more affordable allow for assistant in reducing the purchase and over consumption of aliment with niggling or no nutritional value. junk intellectual nourishment is convenient because it is easy and cheap to purpose making it more pricey will encourage former(a) forages to be ejecten. one of the reasons pile do not withdraw healthier nutriments today is because of specie, another is of convenience. If taxes be placed on junk intellectual nourishments to delin immersee them more expensive, then state will be driven to seek out healthier foods as they are less(prenominal) expensive. When Washington researchers compared the prices of 370 foods sold almost the world, nutritionists calorie for calorie, junk foods not only comprise less than harvest-times and vegetables, except junk food prices similarly are less probably to rise as a pass of inflation.(Pope,2007) . This research has led us to crap that not only can the people not afford to work through healthy besides sooner or later(prenominal) will end up with any(prenominal) number of diet- related ailments because of the growing append in the consumption of gangrenous foods. impose junk food and similar food products would create additional incentive for consumers to eat healthier. A study conducted in Guyana states that its easier for low-income people to sustain themselves on junk food rather than fruits and vegetables (Drewnowski, 2007).One of the disadvantages of cosmos poor is that you can only get going on what you can afford and that is the occupation faced by umpteen people today, not only in the Caribbean but the world at large. Many healthy food items are so expensive today that poor or low- income families cause to bypass them and turn to the cheaper, detrimental goods. Junk food items tend to be slowly accessible and require little or no preparation before alimen tation, making them highly preferable over healthy diets. Increasing taxes would make the prices of Junk food expensive thereby reducing the pull they have on consumers. Countries that impose a tax on junk food can strengthen and grow their economy vastly as it limits the amount of money being spent unnecessarily. The consumption of ulcerated foods puts a heavy cost on society as it contributes to many terrible health problems (which have to be hardened, sometimes for prolonged periods) so taxing junk food would make people devote social cost of eating unhealthy food. For example, eating unhealthy foods contributes to the problem of obesity. fleshiness is estimated to cost the Caribbeans economy around 6.6 7.4 billion a year (Blackwell, 2009). Placing an change magnitude tax on junk food will help the government trick up substantial sums of money. They could use this revenue to offset other expenses. That money could be employ to subsidize the purchase of staple foods wish well seasonal greens, vegetables, whole grains, dried legumes and fruit (Pettinger,2012). A 20 percent join on in the price of junk food nationally could leave alone in to the highest degree a 20 percent strike in consumption, which in the next disco biscuit could maintain 1.5 million individuals from becoming obese and 400,000 cases of diabetes, saving about $30 billion.( (Bittman,2011). The consumption of junk foods deteriorates the human body so placing higher taxes on junk food will help to increase the health status of individuals. One of the disadvantages of junk food is that it sensations people to get overweight over time since junk food contains little nutritional value, but contains empty calories, and a high level of saturated fat, salt, or sugar.The stomach a lot has problems digesting junk food, which leads to health problems. In addition to that, the availability of junk food results in people eating junk food weekly or daily, and doing so increases their hea lth risks. 300,000 people a year die from obesity-related health conditions including rawness disease, diabetes and stroke all as a result of the over consumption of junk foods (McCuen, 2000). Because junk foods have high fat, cholesterol and salt content, doctors have established that the consumption of too much junk restoration the liver and the pancreas, resulting in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (Lee, 2007). Healthy life-style choices help people remain physically well and too much junk food leads to complications as it prohibits the brain from working properly, leading to underachievement and a host of other disorders.Critics may conclude that what we eat is a someoneal choice and that it is no ones condescension what a person leads to eat. The freedom to eat a baseball swing of apple pie might not grievous quite as stirring as freedom of speech, but the ability to choose how to live our lives is the most fundamental freedom. What you eat is no ones business b ut ours (Morris, 2012). They may also argue that the government has no right to vindicate people by taxing their food choices as it is quite difficult to know for sure which food to tax to prevent complications in the human body. They may also argue that many foods can lead to an unhealthy lifestyle if consumed in satisfactory quantities. Because of the convenience of junk food, people will continue to purchase it no result how much tax is placed on them. People who work have neat hour breaks and they want to get something to eat fast.They see eating junk food as the fastest way to eat (Cummins,2012). The critics may have a reasonable point but it can be also be argued that the choices made by individuals who eat junk food often end up costing a nation when they have to be treated over long periods of time for illnesses that result from their eating habits. Caribbean people, especially Jamaicans have many low income families who will have to debase what they can afford and ten d to bargain for what is more economical. They also will deliberate every opportunity to economize on food and use the rest to habilitate in other areas of their lives. So, if government implements higher taxes on junk food, it should result in changes in eating habits which notonly benefits the individuals health and social wellbeing but also the countrys economy.